There is probably more rubbish talked about anarchism than any
other political idea. Actually, it has nothing to do with a belief in chaos, death and destruction. Anarchists do not normally carry
bombs, nor do they ascribe any virtue to beating up old ladies.
It is no accident that the sinister image of the mad anarchist is so
accepted. The State, the press and all the assorted authoritarian
types, use every means at their disposal to present anarchy as an
unthinkable state of carnage and chaos. We can expect little else
from power-mongers who would have no power to monger if we
had our way. They have to believe that authority and obedience
are essential in order to justify their own crimes to themselves. The
TV, press and films all preach obedience, and when anarchy is
mentioned at all, it is presented as mindless destruction.
To greater understand anarchy: go here
Some arguments against anarchy:go here
To find out how to achieve anarchy:go here
Conclusion:go here
Recommended Reading:go here
General issues
Anarchism and Capitalism, by Andrew Flood
Also titled "Anarchism Hates Capitalism", an excellent summerization of the sad state of the U.S. libertarian movement's orientation in the early 1990s. Communist Anarchism by Alexander Berkman The Relevence of Anarchism by ? Libertarianism: Bogus Anarchyby Peter Sabatini
Sabatini clears up the confusion within the debate of libertarian socialist theory and
non-capitalist Individualism vs. modern right-wing pro-capitalist perversions of libertarian &
individualist theory and philosophy. Explains why Ayn Rand was no Max Stirner, and Murray
Rothbard no Benjamin Tucker. The Tyranny of Structurelessness by Jo Freeman
An invaluable document detailing the limits of consensus-based organizing and the elite &
tyrannical structures which develop within informal, "structureless" groups.
